Wimps from Outer Space
by - Anthony Baranyi
( With apologies to Dr. Antonia Levi, from whose excellent book “Samurai
from Outer Space – Understanding Japanese Animation” I have borrowed the
title for this series of observations, thoughts and speculations. )
I just had the opportunity to watch an episode of “Maison Ikkoku” for the
first time ( episode 4 which was taped off of Japanese TV for me a couple of
weeks ago ). The first thing that struck me about the show was how much the
“look” of the characters resembled the “look” of the characters in Rumiko
Takahashi’s earlier work, “Urusei Yatsura”. The next thing that struck me
was how differently the characters in Maison Ikkoku “acted” compared to the
characters in Urusei Yatsura. The main male character of Maison Ikkoku,
Yusako Godai, comes over more as a “Tenchi” ( from “Tenchi Muyo” )or
“Keiichi” ( from “Ah My Goddess” ), rather than an “Ataru” ( from Urusei
Yatsura ).
Both Antonia Levi in her book on anime, as well as Trish Ledoux in her “The
Complete Anime Guide – 2nd edition” allude to this tendency in anime to
portray weak male leads in contrast to the “dominant male” outward aspect of
“normal” Japanese society. But neither come up with a good answer to the
characterizations. Why are Yusako, Tenchi, Keiichi and so many other
“college-aged” lead male characters in anime depicted as being confused,
scandalized or even frightened by the women in their shows?
These “wimp” characters also don’t seem to be “having much fun” with their
lives. Everything is serious or desperate. When do these characters laugh,
other than when they are nervous? The lead male character in “Sailor Moon”,
Mamoru, isn’t afraid of the girls in the show as are the guys I mentioned
before, but he doesn’t seem to be comfortable with the girls either. Mamoru
is another character who never laughs or has fun.
A question comes to mind – who are these shows aimed at? Trish Ledoux and
Antonia Levi comment that Maison Ikkoku, Tenchi Muyo and Ah My Goddess are
all popular with the late high school and college crowd in North America.
Why are bashful nerds popular as characters? Who is the audience in Japan,
the same group? Sailor Moon is aimed at early teen females in both Japan and
North America. Mamoru is noble, passive and effectively totally ineffectual
( one would almost say “emasculated” ).
In “Rurouni Kenshin”, Kenshin has his katana blade reversed so that he can’t
kill with it. What is the significance of this “impotence”? Other characters
in the show can, and frequently do, kill with impunity.
Even in the shows with more “aggressive” male leads there are constraints on
their actions. In “Meitantei Conan”, Shinichi starts out as a brash,
successful and independent young man who is admired by his peers, his elders
and the girls around him. But this hubris is quickly dashed once he
involuntarily becomes “Conan”. As Conan, he is a child again, dependent upon
others. He even has to pretend to be his girlfriend Ran’s little cousin in
order to survive and try to find a solution to his problem. As Shinichi, he
was in control of the relationship with Ran. As Conan, he is dependent upon
Ran and she gives the orders like a surrogate mother. There can be no
“adult” relationship between the two of them.
Is there a common thread about growing up and leaving “Mother” in these
stories? Let’s go back to my first “counter-example”. One of the perpetual
questions concerning Urusei Yatsura is why does Ataru treat Lum the way that
he does? Sure, Ataru will go out of his way to save Lum from danger or to
fight against another suitor, but when there is no threat Ataru does his
best to keep away from Lum and all of her charms. The standard claim that
Ataru is just a “lecher” doesn’t seem to answer this in any satisfactory
manner. If Ataru is so lecherous, why doesn’t he take advantage of the
circumstances wherein he is co-domiciled with a sexy and seemingly willing
girl? His “lechery” consists of ( almost totally unsuccessfully ) asking
other girls for dates ( most often to have tea with him ). This is not the
usual definition of lechery.
I believe that what we are seeing instead is Ataru’s reaction to having
another “Mother” show up in his life at a time when he is still dependent
upon his own mother. Lum’s interests in Ataru are always maternal – she
doesn’t want to have “fun” with Ataru ( at least the sort of “fun” that
fills most teenaged boy’s fantasies ), she wants to cook and care for Ataru.
The only time Lum refers to sex is early in the series when she is competing
with Shinobu for Ataru. Even then the threat is revealed to be only a bluff
and Ataru is taken aback by the innuendo.
In “Tenchi Muyo”, the “good girls” ( Ayeka and Sasami for instance ) want to
mother Tenchi. Only the “bad girl”, Ryoko, ever tries to seduce him and
Tenchi fights this off. Tenchi’s father is shown as an ineffectual “hentai”,
but he is old and can be ignored by the girls. Eventually we learn that
Tenchi gets his “purity” from his late mother.
We are asked to accept that Keiichi spends months living next to Belldandy,
lusting in his heart but not having the courage to even kiss her. Belldandy
has been described elsewhere as the “perfect Japanese mother” as she
selflessly cooks, cleans and does noble miracles for Keiichi. Only Urd shows
any sexuality, and is effectively “punished” for it by being banished to
live chastely with Belldandy and Keiichi. ( Eventually in the manga Urd is
“exorcised” of her “dark” side and becomes “pure” like her two sisters. )
So in the end we are left with more questions than answers. Is this just an
example of “unwritten” societal rules in Japan? Is it a by-product of the
influence of old American animation from the days of the “Motion Picture
Code”? Is it an example of cross-cultural reactions to the realities of
growing up? It any event it is an interesting area for thought, if for no
other reason than because these characters still attract us in spite of
their behaviors.
By-the-way, for those of you who might be tempted to reply to all of this
with “It’s only a cartoon”, I will happily reply with the famous response
“…and Moby Dick is a book about a whale”.
|