Re: Sakura Taisen on Gameboy

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

John Hokanson Jr. (isamu@USAGI.COM)
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 22:54:15 -0800


X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
Message-ID:  <022301be50d4$59015160$562454d1@default>
Date:         Thu, 4 Feb 1999 22:54:15 -0800
From: "John Hokanson Jr." <isamu@USAGI.COM>
Subject:      Re: Sakura Taisen on Gameboy

Ahem. I don't EVEN have to say anything here. All I have to do in order to
explain Red's motivations is this:

$$$

Well actually, I suppose *this* is more accurate:

¥¥¥

"^_-"

*BUT* I should probably just read the damn article just the same.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Barragán <devilot@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
To: SAKURATAISEN-LIST@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU
<SAKURATAISEN-LIST@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU>
Date: Thursday, February 04, 1999 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Sakura Taisen on Gameboy

>>that wasnt something the soj pres said as a compromise...he said that
>>sarcastically...in other words, hes pissed at both nintendo at red...and
so
>am
>>i...
>>
>
>Ditto. I can't believe that, considering how _well_ Sega's treated Red,
>Red would go and do a stinkin' GAME BOY Sakura Taisen title and jeopardize
>their relationship with SoJ over it. ST was probably the most recognized
>title for the Saturn in Japan, and it must really hurt that they're going
to
>make an ST title for Nintendo...I still can't really believe they're doing
>this. I mean, geez, a GB title wouldn't even have voice, and that's such
an
>integral part of ST...:(
>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view