Jose Barragán (devilot@WORLDNET.ATT.NET)
Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:57:51 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 Message-ID: <000801be6f48$06bb01c0$f3e04d0c@141149625> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:57:51 -0400 From: Jose Barragán <devilot@WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Subject: Re: Sakura question
>>> Speaking of the Real dolls, anyone think they are going to be continued?
>>>
>>> Rol
>>
>>I hope you're talking about Real MODELS and not Realdolls. A Sakura
>>Realdoll would be too ecchi for words.
>>
>>Tom Cheng
>
>Anoo...why would a Real Doll be ecchi? Personally I think
>Real Models are more ecchi than the Real Dolls. Take
>Sakura for example. With the Real Doll, it ain't that sexy
>looking at the naked doll. With a Real Model OTOH, they've
>got some nice details as far as the bottom portion is
>concerned... :D~ The only exception for the dolls would
>be the Kanna doll since she has very nice chest...
Wait a sec. The Real Dolls are the Tsukuda Hobby poseable ones, right? Not
the huge Barbie-lookalike ones?
If so, I agree with you regarding Kanna's chest.;)
>
>The above perverted viewpoint brought to you by
>Yasu
The above perverted reply brought to you by
JEB
-Defender of Iris and Kanna!