Chris Rowley (sf6nc@SCFN.THPL.LIB.FL.US)
Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:16:09 -0500
X-Sender: X-Sender: sf6nc@scfn Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.95.990315201323.11879A-100000@scfn> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:16:09 -0500 From: Chris Rowley <sf6nc@SCFN.THPL.LIB.FL.US> Subject: Re: Sakura question
I believe the "Real Doll", being referred to as "ecchi", is the one
recently on an HBO special. That "Real Doll", is a life size sex doll with
a fully articulated skeleton and from a distance it looks like a real
women. Supposedly everything works on it. O.O Eeeerk!
Chris
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, [iso-8859-1] Jose Barragán wrote:
> >>> Speaking of the Real dolls, anyone think they are going to be continued?
> >>>
> >>> Rol
> >>
> >>I hope you're talking about Real MODELS and not Realdolls. A Sakura
> >>Realdoll would be too ecchi for words.
> >>
> >>Tom Cheng
> >
> >Anoo...why would a Real Doll be ecchi? Personally I think
> >Real Models are more ecchi than the Real Dolls. Take
> >Sakura for example. With the Real Doll, it ain't that sexy
> >looking at the naked doll. With a Real Model OTOH, they've
> >got some nice details as far as the bottom portion is
> >concerned... :D~ The only exception for the dolls would
> >be the Kanna doll since she has very nice chest...
>
>
> Wait a sec. The Real Dolls are the Tsukuda Hobby poseable ones, right? Not
> the huge Barbie-lookalike ones?
> If so, I agree with you regarding Kanna's chest.;)
>
> >
> >The above perverted viewpoint brought to you by
> >Yasu
>
> The above perverted reply brought to you by
> JEB
> -Defender of Iris and Kanna!
>