Re: Petition For Sakura 3

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jose Barragán (devilot@WORLDNET.ATT.NET)
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 21:52:15 -0400


X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
Message-ID:  <001f01bef353$7d629380$04e04d0c@141149625>
Date:         Mon, 30 Aug 1999 21:52:15 -0400
From: Jose Barragán <devilot@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Subject:      Re: Petition For Sakura 3

>I'm sorry, but i just have to say something here... flame war or no flame >war. I hardly think things have escalated to a flame war...I've been trying to keep out of it, but I'm going to respond to a particular point in your post, Terrence. >> Yep. They look like they actually translated by somebody fluent in English. >> Something I can't say about the majority of translated games. >> You're right. It'll be in English, a language I'm fluent in, rather than >> Japanese, which I have virtually no understanding of. > >These statements really show your ignorance about the entire matter. Even >Vic/WD fans know that they don't "translate' games. They buy the rights >and do whatever they darn feel like with the dialog, with the text. That's not exactly true. The story itself and the dialogue and plot points are preserved pretty much intact. Vic showed us a comparison of a 'straight' translation from Lunar: SSSC and what WD had done to it, and basically they just made the language a bit more flowery and added a few metaphors, but preserved every single line of the original. What Working Designs _does_ change a _lot_ is NPC dialogue. Vic has stated that they pretty much rewrote what every single villager in Lunar said from the Japanese version. My point is, and has always been, that if WD translated a Sakura Taisen game, they would obviously preserve the integrity of already fantastic writing, because there are no village NPCs to add 'cute' dialogue to. Dragon Force was similar in this respect, since the only extraneous dialogue was that of the various generals one could command in battle. The story sequences were not changed at all in content. If push comes to shove, why don't we simply ask Vic on RGVSega? I'm sure he'd be happy to respond to a hypothetical question if phrased the correct way (i.e., if we asked him politely what kind of translation style he'd have used on Sakura Taisen, as to whether it would have been a 'straight' translation or whether he'd have changed/added anything...hmmm, maybe I should ask him). > >If you like Vic's writing, fine. If you hate it, that is perfectly >understandable as well. But saying something like "Oh, but it's in >English" is totally besides the point. > >Screw that. As if the sheer fact that is has roman characters makes it >all good. It's YOU lazy americans who allows games to be ruined, yet >don't care. You no-standard ... *argh* Uh... > >-(a slightly pissed off) terrence


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view