Matt Seidl (mseidl@DRIVENINC.COM)
Fri, 5 Feb 1999 06:28:25 -0500
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 Message-ID: <01be50fa$a4e6fc80$d1a9dad1@rseidl.ppp.ford.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 06:28:25 -0500 From: Matt Seidl <mseidl@DRIVENINC.COM> Subject: In support of Sakura Taisen on Gameboy
>Ditto. I can't believe that, considering how _well_ Sega's treated Red,
>Red would go and do a stinkin' GAME BOY Sakura Taisen title and jeopardize
>their relationship with SoJ over it. ST was probably the most recognized
>title for the Saturn in Japan, and it must really hurt that they're going
>to make an ST title for Nintendo...I still can't really believe they're
>doing this. I mean, geez, a GB title wouldn't even have voice, and
>that's such an integral part of ST...:(
Explain to me how more Sakura Taisen titles is a *bad* thing? Explain why
I don't want something like ST Columns for my GBC? (I mean, I can't get it
for my Saturn, as the great god Sega sees fit to keep it from becoming a
Saturn Collection rerelease) Considering that nobody here appears to be
opposed to the Win95/98 version, I get the impression that this feeling is
inspired by the old "system wars", "us versus them" mentality. I can't see
why anyone would have a problem with more people being exposed to the ST
series.
What if the Dreamcast fails, and Sega goes belly up (not that it will)...
should ST die with them?!